WebAug 27, 2015 · The underlying case, Nissen v. Pierce County, pits the deputy against county government and the prosecutor. Four years ago, Nissen filed a records request with Pierce County, seeking... WebMay 14, 2024 · In Nissen v. Pierce County, 183 Wash.2d 863, the Washington Supreme Court found that “text messages sent and received by a public employee in the employee’s official capacity are public records of the employer, even if the employee uses a private cell phone.” In the case, the Pierce County prosecutor used his personal cell phone in the ...
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF …
WebAug 28, 2015 · On August 27, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously held in Nissen v. Pierce County that text messages sent or received by a public employee in his or her official capacity are public records within the meaning of the Public Records Act (PRA), even if the employee is using a personal cell phone. WebAug 28, 2015 · The case involved two PRA requests by Glenda Nissen, a county employee, related to Pierce County Prosecutor Mark Lindquist's use of his personal cell phone. It was undisputed that Lindquist “personally bought the phone, pays for its monthly service, and sometimes uses it in the course of his job.” dinamicko trenje
Arthur West, Respondent, v. Steve Vermillion, City of Puyallup ...
WebThe case, Nissen v. Pierce County, is in its fourth year. The legal bills so far: at least $282,490, according to the latest figures from the county’s risk management department. The money has gone to outside attorneys, hired at public expense to defend Lindquist’s and the county’s position and guard his phone records. WebMRSC - WA State Supreme/Appellate Court Decisions WebPierce County. [5] After the Supreme Court granted review, it affirmed the Court of Appeals. The Nissen court concluded that the PRA reaches employee-owned cell phones when used for agency business, noting that the definition of … dinamica zip zap boing